Problematik Definisi Harta Pailit untuk Mencapai Kepastian Hukum dalam Pelaksanaan Kepailitan dan PKPU


Adriel Michael Tirayo(1*), Yoefanca Halim(2),


(1) Universitas Tarumanagara
(2) Universitas Tarumanagara
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


A legal product is expected to realize 3 legal purposes, which is Justice, Expediency and Legal Certainty. The definition of bankrupt assets is not mentioned implicitly in the Bankruptcy Law, that can lead to multiple interpretations. In practice, it happened in the court judgement Number 33/Pailit/2009/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst for the bankruptcy of PT. Tripanca Group, due to the absence of clear provisions relationg to bankruptcy assets. In this case, the problem to be answered is how is the implementation of bankrupt assets definitions in the court judgement Number 33/Pailit/2009/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst and the efforts that can be made related to the implementation of bankrupt assets definitions. This research used normative juridical method through literature study, then the data has been analized qualitatively and conclusions are drawn inductively. The results showed that the definition of "bankruptcy assets" in practice led to multiple interpretations as contained in the court judgement Number 33/Pailit/2009/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst, where the judge also included assets that did not belong to the debtor (third party collateral) into assets bankruptcy as a guarantee of repayment of debt. Therefore, efforts that can be made by the government are to revise the Bankruptcy Law, specifically related to the definition of Bankruptcy Assets to provide Legal Certainty and to disseminate information to legal entities, non-legal entities, and the public so as to gain understanding and knowledge related to Bankruptcy and PKPU in particular about bankruptcy assets.


Keywords


Bankrupt Assets, Bankruptcy Law, Legal Certainty

Full Text:

Untitled

References


Buku

Anisah, S. (2008). Perlindungan Kepentingan Kreditor dan Debitor dalam Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Total Media.

Salim, H.S. (2004). Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Hartini, R. (2007). Hukum Kepailitan Edisi Revisi. Malang: UMM Press.

__________. (2001). Pengantar Hukum Perdata Tertulis (BW). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Marzuki, P. (2008). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Miller, D. Principles of Social Justice. London: Harvard University Press.

Patrik, P. K. (2007). Hukum Jaminan Edisi Revisi dengan UUHT. Semarang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.

Situmorang, V., dan Soekarso H. (1994). Pengantar Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Damlah, Juditia. (2017).”Akibat Hukum Putusan Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004”. Jurnal Lex Crimen. VI (2).

Gabrielle, Maria. (2018). “Eksekusi Jaminan Dalam Kepailitan Pada Kreditor Separatis Ketika Ditangani Oleh Kurator”. Jurist-Diction Law Journal. 1 (2).

Irianto, Catur. (2015). “Penerapan Asas Kelangsungan Usaha Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Kepaulutan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU)”. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan. 4 (3).

Kasgari, A.A., Hasan, S.S, dan Fatemeh, E. (2013). “A Review of Bankruptcy and Its Prediction”. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences. 3 (4).

Megarita. (2014). Legal Protection for the Debtor and Credit or Pledge of Shares on Credit Banking in Indonesia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 4 (12).

Muslih, M. 2013. Negara Hukum Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Teori Hukum Gustav Radbruch (Tiga Nilai Dasar Hukum). Jurnal Legalitas. IV (1).

Nola, L.F. (2017). Kedudukan Konsumen Dalam Kepailitan. Jurnal DPR RI, Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan. 8 (2).

Onakoya, A.B. dan Ayooluwa, E.O. (2017). Bankruptcy and Insolvency: An Exploration of Relevant Theories. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues. 7 (3).

Prabowo, R. E., Nawi, S, dan Zainuddin. (2018). Legal Analysis of Debtor Debt Realization of Creditor Through Bankruptcy. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 23 (4).

Supartoyo, Yesi, H., Jen, T, dan Sendouw, R.H.E.. (2013). The Economic Growth and The Regional Characteristics: The Case of Indonesia. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan.

Yuhelson., M. (2016). The Priority Distribution of Wealth the Debtorâs Bankrupt (Boedel Bankruptcy) Towards Separatist and Preferential of Creditor Based on Principles of Fairness and Legal. The Southeast Asia Law Journal. 2 (1).

Internet

Tobing, L. (2012). Mengenal Asas Lex Spesialis Derogat Legi Generalis. Diunduh di https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt509fb7e13bd25/lex-spesialis-dan-lex-genralis tanggal 30 Agustus.

Siregar, N.R. (2012). Perbedaan Antara Kreditur Separatis dan Kreditur Konkuren. Diunduh di https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/cl1998/apa-yang-dimaksud-dengan-kreditur-separatis-dan-kreditur-konkuren-dalam-kepailitan tanggal 10 Juli.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v6i2.2963

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
Untitled - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ISSN 2355-987X (Print) | ISSN 2622-061X (Online)