Konstruksi Indikator dan Formula Penilaian Kualitas Pemilu di Indonesia

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31289/jppuma.v7i1.2000
Lati Praja Delmana(1*), Aidinil Zetra(2), Alfan Miko(3),


(1) universitas andalas
(2) Pascasarjana Jurusan Ilmu Politik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, Universitas Andalas
(3) Jurusan Sosiologi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, Universitas Andalas
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


General elections in Indonesia that have been carried out since 1955 have proceeded without having clear election quality indicators and indicators. Improving the quality of elections is one of the keys to realizing quality democracy. Standard indicators and evaluations of the quality of elections in previous studies were not able to represent the principles of Pancasila democratic values, local political cultural values, and heterogeneous conditions of Indonesian society, so special studies were needed to improve election quality standards in accordance with conditions in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to develop indicators and instruments for assessing the quality of National Elections in Indonesia. The research method used is library research supported by the results of relevant research. Indicators for evaluating the quality of elections are built through all aspects of the pre, post and post-election governance process. All aspects meet the principles of equality, freedom, justice, transparency, professionalism, security, integrity and adjustment of local political culture. Assessment of election quality can be carried out through the opinion trail method and measured by ordinal measurement scale. Standardization The national election quality index established and developed in accordance with the times, guarantees the accuracy of measuring the quality of elections, so that the quality of elections can be improved on an ongoing and consistent basis.

Keywords


Election Quality, Election Indonesia, Assesment Election

References


Dwipayana, A. (2005). Cost Of Democracy di Tiga Kabupaten, Yogyakarta: Laboratorium Jurusan Ilmu Pemerintahan Fisipol UGM, 2005

Alemika, E.E.O. (2007). Quality Of Elections, Satifaction With Democracy And Political Trust In Africa.Afro Barometer Working Paper.Church Square:Afro Barometer

Arikunto, S. (2002). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Badan Pengawas Republik Indonesia. (2015).Indek kerawanan Pemilu pada Pilkada 2015. Jakarta: Bawaslu RI

Badan Pengawas Republik Indonesia. (2014).Laporan Hasil Pengawasan Pemilu Presiden dan Wakil Presiden tahun (2014). Jakarta: Bawaslu RI

Bawaslu RI. (2018). Indeks Kerawanan Pemilu 2018. Jakarta: Bawaslu RI

Carter, D. (2010). Electoral Systems and Election Management. diunduh di https://www. researchgate.net/ publication/237654779 tanggal 8 Oktober 2018

Darnolf, S. Ellena, K. Lippolis, E. Shein, E & Vickery, C.(2015). Election Audits: International Principles That Protect Election Integrity. Washington: International Foundation For Electoral System (IFFS)

Eklit, J & Reynolds, A. (2005) .Framework for the Systematic Study of Election Quality. Democratization. 12 (2): 147-162

Gleko, P. Suprojo, A. & Lestari, A.W. (2017). Strategi Komisi Pemilihan Umum Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Partisipasi Politik Masyarakat Pada Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. 6 (1): 38-47

Hantoro, N.M. (2018). Permasalahan hukum pada tahap pencalonan Pemilu 2019. Pusat penelitian Badan Keahlian DPR RI.X (16):1-6

Halyb, A.F. Liando, D.M. Mamentu, M.. (2017). Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Keuangan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Kabupaten Konawe. Tesis. Tata Kelola Pemilu Pasca Sarjana Unsrat.

Hirano, S. & Synder Jr. M, James. (2014). Primary Elections and the Quality of Elected Ocials. Paper. Columbia University & Harvard University.

International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA). (2001). Standar-standar internasional untuk Pemilihan Umum. Sweden: Bulls Tryckeri

Mozaffar, S. & Schedler, A. (2002). The Comparative Study of Electoral Governance—Introduction. International Political Science Review. 23(1): 5-27

Norris, P. Frank, R. Martinez, F. (2013). ”Assessing The Quality Of Election”. Journal of Democracy. 24 ( 4):124-135

National Conference of State Legislatures (2019). Post Election Audit. Diunduh di http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/post-election-audits635926066.aspx tanggal 05 Januari 2019

Rexha, B. Murturi, I. Shabani, I. & Rexhepi, A. (2016). Improving Quality of Election Process Using Crowdsourcing Techniques. International Journal of Applied Mathematics,Electronics and Computers. 4(4):107-112

Ramadhanil, dkk. (2015). Desain Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pemantauan Pemilu”. Handbook. Kemitraan Pembaharuan Tata Pemerintahan di Indonesia

Sehat, C.M. (2015). Observing (And Assessing) The Good Election New Approaches To Electoral Obligations And Integrity From The Carter Center.The carter center.Electoral Risk Management Conference.The carter center

Sindikasi Pemilu dan Demokrasi. (2016). Problematika Pemetaan dan Pembentukan Peta Daerah Pemilihan Pemilu Indonesia.Jakarta:Media Sindikasi Pemilu dan Demokrasi

Surat Keputusan Komisi Pemilihan Umum nomor 231/PL.03.1-Kpt/06/KPU/XII/2017 tentang Petunjuk TeknisStandar Kemampuan Jasmani dan Rohani serta Satandar Pemeriksaan Kesehatan Jasmani, Rohani dan Bebas Penyalahgunaan Narkotika dalam Pemilihan Gubernur dan Wakil Gubernur dan Wakil Bupati, dan/atau Walikota dan Wakil Walikota

Surbakti, R. Supriyanto, D. Santoso, T. (2008). “Perekayasaan Sistem Pemilihan Umum Untuk Pembangunan Tata Politik Demokratis”. Jakarta: Kemitraan bagi Pembaharuan Tata Pemerintahan di Indonesia

Saleh, T. (2006). Surplus atau defisit demokrasi? Pilkada dibanyak daerah”Opini Jawa Pos. 8 Juni 2006

The Carter Center. (2014). Election Obligations and Standards a Carter Center Assessment Manual. Handbook. Atlanta: One Copenhill

The Ace Electoral Knowledge Network. (2014). Measuring the Quality of Election.Diunduh di http://aceproject.org/ ace-en/focus/measuring-electoral-quality.tanggal 7 Oktober 2018.

Utari, I.S. (2016). Pencegahan Politik Uang dan Penyelenggaraan Pilkada yang berkualitas: Sebuah Revitalisasi Ideologi.Seminar Nasional Hukum. 2 (1):451-474

Zein, K. (2014). Laporan Evaluasi Pemilu 2014. Jakarta: Lembaga Penelitian Pendidikan Penerangan Ekonomi Sosial (LP3ES).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31289/jppuma.v7i1.2000

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance and Political Social UMA)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

JPPUMA: JURNAL ILMU PEMERINTAHAN DAN SOSIAL POLITIK UMA (JOURNAL OF GOVERNANCE AND POLITICAL SOCIAL UMA)
Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Medan Area
Universitas Medan Area, Jalan Kolam No. 1, Pasar V, Medan Estate, Sumatera Utara http://ojs.uma.ac.id/index.php/jppuma dan Email: jppuma@uma.ac.id
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2549-1660 (Print), ISSN 2550-1305 (Online)