Analysis of the Use of Twitter BPBD DKI in Disaster Mitigation


Diah Wahyuningsih(1), Suswanta Suswanta(2),


(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Abstract


This study aims to explain how the use of twitter in disseminating disaster information in order to increase public awareness of natural disasters, namely the twitter account @BPBDJakarta. The research method used is qualitative research with descriptive analysis techniques using Twitter content analysis, one of the government-owned social media accounts using the Nvivo 12 Plus application. In addition, the research also uses data triangulation to obtain the required data. The source is obtained from information from credible online newspapers that have been registered with the press council, so that the information submitted can be justified. The results of this study conclude that the Jakarta Regional Disaster Management Agency's twitter account coordinates all units involved in disaster management. The information posted by BPBD DKI Jakarta on its twitter account is a form of disaster management stages which include pre-disaster (preparedness, early warning and mitigation), during a disaster (emergency response and disaster management), and post-disaster (rehabilitation and reconstruction). The contribution of hastags twitter on the Twitter account of the Jakarta Regional Disaster Management Agency for flood disaster mitigation in this case this Twitter account acts as a government medium to listen to information obtained from # hashtags that often appear on its twitter account.

Keywords


Flood; Disaster Mitigation; Social Media.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akbar, R., Abedi, N., Handayani, R., Meiliya, U., & Putri, E. (2017). Analisis Hasil Implementasi Business Intelligence Menentukan Daerah Rawan Banjir dan Kebakaran di Indonesia. 3(1), 65–70.

David, C. C., Ong, J. C., & Legara, E. F. T. (2016). Tweeting supertyphoon Haiyan: Evolving functions of twitter during and after a disaster event. PLoS ONE, 11(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150190

Dzulfaroh, A. N. (2020). Media sosial dan Politik.pdf. Kompas.com. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2020/01/03/054700765/media-sosial-dan-banjir-jakarta-?page=all

Fahriyani, S., & Harmaningsih, D. (2020). PENGGUNAAN MEDIA SOSIAL TWITTER UNTUK. 4(2), 56–65.

Hassan, S. U., Aljohani, N. R., Idrees, N., Sarwar, R., Nawaz, R., Martínez-Cámara, E., Ventura, S., & Herrera, F. (2019). Predicting literature’s early impact with sentiment analysis in Twitter. Knowledge-Based Systems, 105383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105383

Kahfi, R. A. (2019). BRANDING POLITIK JOKOWI-MA’RUF AMIN PADA PEMILIHAN PRESIDEN 2019 DI MEDIA SOSIAL TWITTER. 1–6. http://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/31872

Katrina, S. (2011). Strengthening resilience through mitigation planning. Natural Hazards Observer, XXXVI(2), 1–24.

Kim, J., & Hastak, M. (2018). Social network analysis: Characteristics of online social networks after a disaster. International Journal of Information Management, 38(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.08.003

Landwehr, P., & Carley, K. (2014). Social Media in Disaster Relief Usage Patterns, Data Mining Tools, and Current Research Directions. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery for Big Data Studies in Big Data, Volume 1, 225–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40837-3

Latonero, M., & Shklovski, I. (2011). Emergency Management, Twitter, and Social Media Evangelism. International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, 3(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4018/jiscrm.2011100101

Panagiotopoulos, P., Barnett, J., Bigdeli, A. Z., & Sams, S. (2016). Social media in emergency management: Twitter as a tool for communicating risks to the public. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 111, 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.010

Reynard, D., & Shirgaokar, M. (2019). Harnessing the power of machine learning: Can Twitter data be useful in guiding resource allocation decisions during a natural disaster? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 77(xxxx), 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.03.002

Scarlet, D. (2013). 済無No Title No Title. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Shan, S., Zhao, F., Wei, Y., & Liu, M. (2019). Disaster management 2.0: A real-time disaster damage assessment model based on mobile social media data—A case study of Weibo (Chinese Twitter). Safety Science, 115(August 2018), 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.029

T. Holderness, & E. Turpin. (2015). “From Social Media to GeoSocial Intelligence: Crowdsourcing Civic Co- management for Flood Response in Jakarta, Indonesia”, In Social media for government services. Social Media for Government Services, Springer International Publishing, 2015, 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT-DM.2017.8275672

Theja Bhavaraju, S. K., Beyney, C., & Nicholson, C. (2019). Quantitative analysis of social media sensitivity to natural disasters. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 39(February), 101251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101251

Yabe, T., & Ukkusuri, S. V. (2019). Integrating information from heterogeneous networks on social media to predict post-disaster returning behavior. Journal of Computational Science, 32, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2019.02.002




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/jppuma.v9i1.4317

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2021 JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance and Political Social UMA)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Universitas Medan Area


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License