Penerapan Pre-Sale Disclosure sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Pembeli Bentuk Bisnis “Business Opportunity Ventures” Ditinjau melalui Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen


Astrid Amidiaputri Hasyyati(1*), Mukhammad Tismandico Ilham Zulfikar(2), Kadek Deddy Permana Artha(3), Arif Rahman(4),


(1) Universitas Airlangga
(2) Universitas Airlangga
(3) Universitas Airlangga
(4) Universitas Airlangga
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The form of business "Business Opportunity Ventures" that has developed in Indonesia has the same meaning as the franchise business form, but the two business forms are basically different. BO is regulated in the Business Opportunity Sales Law of 1995 by the Federal Trade Commission of the United States. Different forms of business certainly require different arrangements. This is motivated by the reason that the business forms that have not been regulated in a law are prone to fraud and injustice in the transaction process. buyers of this form of business. In this study using a normative juridical method with the statutory approach, conceptual approach, and comparative approach. Fraud and injustice received by BO Buyers can be done legally through the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency as stipulated in the UUPK.

Keywords


Consumen Protection, Business Opportunity Ventures, franchise, Waralaba, Pre-Sale Disclosure.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku:

Peter Mahmud, Marzuki. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenadamedia group.

H.R. Daeng, Naja. (2006). Seri keterampilan merancang kontrak bisnis, contract drafting. Jakarta : Citra Aditya Bakti.

Adrian, Sutedi. (2008). hukum Waralaba. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia.

Jurnal:

Buckberg ,Joel R. and Dafid J. Kaufmann (2009). Franchise Sales and Disclosure Law, 49th Annual Convention, International Franchise Association.

Hasyyati, Astrid Amidiaputri Hasyyati (2018). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pembeli Bentuk Bisnis “Business Opportunity Ventures”, thesis skripsi, Universitas Airlangga.

Federal Register (2006). Part IV Federal Trade Commission 16 CFR Part 437 Business Opportuniy Rule;Notice Proposed Rulemaking”. Federal Trade Commission.

Federal Register (2008). Federal Trade Comission, 16 CFR Part 37 Business Opportunity Rule; Proposed Rule.

Kanouse, Keith J.(2007), Business Opportunity Rule Means Less Disclosure, but by More Companies, Franchise Law Journal.

Tami Rusli (2012). Penyelesaian Sengketa antara konsumen dan pelaku usaha menurut peraturan perundang-undangan, Keadilan Progresif.

Slamet, Sri Redjeki (2011), Waralaba (franchise) di Indonesia, Lex Jurnalica Esa Unggul University.

Perundang-undangan:

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1999 Nomor 42 Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3821

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 42 Tahun 2007 tentang Waralaba Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2007 Nomor 90 Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4742

Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 06/M-DAG/PER/2/2017 tentang Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2017 Nomor 291

Sumber Lain:

Majalah Direktori Franchise & B.O. Indonseia Edisi IV, Asosiasi Franchise Indonesia.

Illonis Act (815 ILCS 602/) Business Opportunity Sales Law of 1995

Illinois Act (815 ILCS 705/) franchise Disclosure Act of 1987

Illinois Act (815 ILCS 5/) Illinois Securities Law of 1953

Will Kenton , Franchise disclosure document, (https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/franchise-disclosure-document.asp)

Federal Trade Commission “PROTECTING AMERICA’s CONSUMERS” (https://www.ftc.gov/about-ftc/what-we-do )




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v13i1.2985

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Program Pascasarjana, Magister Hukum, Universitas Medan Area
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License