Penerapan Hukum Materil terhadap Pelaku Pembunuhan dengan Unsur Penyertaan (Studi Kasus Putusan Mari No. 966 k/pid/2014)


Elfirda Ade Putri(1*),


(1) Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Murder accompanied by inclusion or carried out jointly is a special form of murder that incriminates the perpetrators. Basically, judges 'considerations in deciding cases, especially with murder cases, are sometimes not in accordance with applicable law, apart from that the sentence imposed is sometimes not in accordance with the perpetrators' actions, so that justice is not obtained, especially for the injured parties. There are differences in sentencing in each court, even though prior to sentencing, the judge has considered the same juridical considerations from each court level, whether it consists of indictments of the public prosecutor, defendant's statements, witness statements, witness statements, evidence and articles of law criminal. The application of material law by the Public Prosecutor in the Supreme Court Decision number 966 K / Pid / 2014 is not right. The public prosecutor uses the subsidair indictment using Article 338 paragraph (1) jo Article 55 of the Criminal Code. Public prosecutor did not ensnare the defendant Article Number 340 of the Indonesian Criminal Code, where the criminal act committed by the defendant contained an element of "planning".

Keywords


Application of Law, Murder, Accompaniment.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alfitra. (2012). Hapusnya Hak & Menuntut Menjalankan Pidana. Jakarta: Raih Asa Sukses.

Arif, M. &. (1984). Teori-teori Kebijakan pidana. Bandung: Alumni.

Azwar, S. (1998). Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Chazawi, A. (2002). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian 3. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.

Chazawi, A. (n.d.). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana.

Irsan, K. (2005). Hak Asasi Manusia dan Hukum. Jakarta.

Kusuma, M. W. (1984). Kriminologi dan masalah kejahatan, (suatu pengantar ringkas). Bandung: Armico.

Lamintang, T. (2010). Hukum Penitensier Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Mulyadi, L. (2007). Putusan Hakim dalam Hukum Acara Pidana; Teori, Praktik, Teknik Penyusunan,dan Permasalahannya. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Nurdin, B. (2012). Kedudukan dan Fungsi Hakim dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Alumni.

Poernomo, A. S. (1990). Hukum Pidana Dasar Aturan Umum Hukum Pidana Kodifikasi. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Prasetyo, T. (2011). Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Putri, K. I. (2007). Hukum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Universitas Bhayangkara.

Soekanto, S. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.

Sri, S. S. (2004). Penelitian Hukum Normatif “Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v13i1.3124

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Program Pascasarjana, Magister Hukum, Universitas Medan Area
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License