Smallholder rubber plantations in South Tapanuli still have the opportunity and huge potential , especially when associated with a society that is still largely rely on rubber plants as an option for propagation . The availability of potential land is still quite wide and supported by government policy in the development of rubber plants also provide great opportunities to the business development of rubber plants in South Tapanuli . Commodity rubber in South Tapanuli a plantation commodities that contributed greatly to the economic development of society . Development of agri commodities rubber growing along with improving commodity prices of rubber inlocal markets , nationally and internationally. Business financially viable smallholder rubber plantations to be developed . Parameter estimation results show that only a partial area of variable parameters rubber previous year ( when different variables ) that significantly influenced the total area . While other parameters rubber real price , price Rid TBS and dummy effect is not real autonomy to the area ! rubber . Coefficient djfferential positive shift indicates that the partial commodity is a commodity rubber plantations do not have a competitive advantage in all areas South Tapanuli . Competitive advantage and rubber commodity acreage only contained in the district of Batang Toni and Angkola West .
Â
Keywords : rubber commodity , institutional farmer , farming , KUD
Aidi, D.S. 2007. Pengembangan Agribisnis Karet Berbisnis Lateks dan Kayu. Balai Penelitian Karet Sungai Putih. Medan.
Amypalupy, K. 1998. Produksi Bahan Tanaman Karet, pp 34-44. Dalam: Pengelolaan Bahan Tanam Karet. Balit Sembawa-Puslit Karet. Palembang.
Badan Statistik Sumatera Utara. 200 1-2005. Sumatera Utara dalam Angka. Badan statistik Sumatera Utara. Medan.
Deptan. 2006. Program dan Kagiatan Departemen Pertanian Tahun 2007. Departemen Pertanian. Jakarta.
Daslin, A. 2002. Produktivitas Kion Karet Anjuran dan Kesesuaiannya pada Berbagai Kendala Lingkungan. Warta Pusat Penelitian Karet. 21:1-3.
Dijkman, M.J. 1951. Hevea. Thirty Years of Research in the Far East. University of Miami Press. Coral Gables. Florida.
Dinas Perkebunan Sumut. 1995-2007. Data Statistik Perkebunan Sumatera Utara, Disbun Provinsi Sumatera Utara. Medan.
Ditjenbun. 2006. Rancangan Road Map Karet 2006-2025. Direktorat Perkebunan, Deptan. Jakarta.
Ditjenbun. 2007. Program dan Kegiatan Perkebunan Tahun 2007. Direktorat Perkebunan, Deptan. Jakarta.
Ditjenbun. 2007. Pedoman Umum Program Revitalisasi Perkebunan (Kelapa Sawit, Karet dan Karet). Direktorat Perkebunan, Deptan. Jakarta.
Ditjen Bina Produksi Perkebunan. 2006. Statistik Perkebunan Indonesia. Ditjen Bina Produksi Perkebunan, Deptan. Jakarta.
Masduki, 2001. Kelembagaan Petani dan Peranannya Dalam Mengorganisir Pemasaran Hasil Pertanian. Rapat Koorinasi Program PHT-PR, 13 November 2001. Jakarta.
Masduki, 2001. Kelembagaan Petani dan Peranannya Dalam Mengorganisir Pemasaran Hasil Pertanian. Rapat Koordinasi Program PHT-PR, 13 November 2001, Jakarta.
Untung K., 2003. Strategi Implementasi PHT Dalam Pengembangan Perkebunan Rakyat Berbasis Agribisnis. Risalah Simposium Nasional Penelitian PHT Perkebunan Rakyat, Bogor 17-18 September 2002, Bagian Proyek PHT Tanaman Perkebunan.
Wahyudi A., 2003. Kinerja dan Perpek4f Program KebUakan Sosial Ekonomi Dalam Mendukung Pengembangan dan Implementasi PIZIT Perkebunan Rakyat Berbasis Agribisnis. Risalah Simposium Nasional Penelitian PHT Perkebunan Rakyat, Bogor 17-18 September 2002, Bagian Proyek PHT Tanaman Perkebunan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
The UMA Open Access Journals provides quality journal publication services to documenting and preserving scientific article from the results of your research.