Apakah Misleading Headline News Covid-19 Berpengaruh terhadap Keputusan Membaca Isi Berita?
Authors
Cucu Taqyah , Rachmi Silviana , Adilla Aulia Anwar , Fitri Ariyanti AbidinDOI:
10.31289/diversita.v8i1.5536Published:
2022-06-02Issue:
Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): JURNAL DIVERSITA JUNIKeywords:
Curiosity gap, Dual-process theory, Mahasiswa, Misleading headlines, Pengambilan keputusanArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Abstract
Headline merupakan hal yang pertama kali dilihat oleh calon pembaca berita. Misleading headline adalah jenis headline yang secara sengaja menutupi informasi penting, mengemas judul dengan menarik agar banyak orang membaca isi berita tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah misleading headline news Covid-19 berpengaruh terhadap keputusan mahasiswa untuk membaca isi berita. Pendekatan eksperimental digunakan dengan rancangan between participant post-test only design. Alat ukur yang digunakan adalah kuesioner pengambilan keputusan dengan skala Likert 1-6. Teknik sampling yang digunakan untuk memilih subjek penelitian adalah simple random sampling. Subjek penelitian berjumlah 48 orang mahasiswa yang dibagi menjadi kelompok eksperimen dan kelompok kontrol, masing-masing berjumlah 24 orang. Analisis data menggunakan uji Independent Sample t-test dengan aplikasi SPSS versi 22 for Windows. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa non-misleading headline news Covid-19 yang berpengaruh terhadap keputusan untuk membaca isi berita pada mahasiswa. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa mahasiswa memiliki keterampilan evaluasi kritis dan literasi informasi dalam keputusan membaca berita.Â
References
Abdullah, I. (2020). Covid-19: Threat and fear in Indonesia. Psychological trauma: theory, research, practice, and policy, 12(5), 488. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2020-41738-001
Adiarsi, G. R., Stellarosa, Y., & Silaban, M. W. (2015). Literasi media internet di kalangan mahasiswa. Humaniora, 6(4), 470–482. https://doi.org/10.21512/HUMANIORA.V6I4.3376
Amalia, I., Suzanna, E., & Adyani, L. (2021). Peran religiusitas bagi masyarakat aceh dalam menghadapi pandemi covid-19. JURNAL DIVERSITA, 7(1), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.31289/diversita.v7i1.4535
Anand, A., Chakraborty, T., & Park, N. (2017). We used neural networks to detect clickbaits: You won’t believe what happened next! European Conference on Information Retrieval , 10193 LNCS, 541–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56608-5_46
APA. (2015). APA dictionary of psychology (2nd edition). American Psychological Association.
Bafadhal, O. M., & Santoso, A. D. (2020). Memetakan pesan hoaks berita covid-19 di Indonesia lintas kategori, sumber, dan jenis disinformasi. Bricolage : Jurnal Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, 6(02), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.30813/BRICOLAGE.V6I02.2148
Christensen, L. B. (2007). Experimental methodology (10th edition). Pearson Education.
Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., Chang, E. P., & Pillai, R. (2014). The effects of subtle misinformation in news headlines. Journal of experimental psychology: applied, 20(4), 323. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-44652-001
Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., Cheung, C. S., & Maybery, M. T. (2015). He did it! She did it! No, she did not! Multiple causal explanations and the continued influence of misinformation. Journal of Memory and Language, 85, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.09.002
El-Arini, K., & Tang, J. (2014). Click-baiting. https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2014/08/news-feed-fyi-click-baiting/
Fraser, K., & Conlan, O. (2020). Enticing notification text & the impact on engagement. Adjunct Proceedings of the 2020 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2020 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 444–449. https://doi.org/10.1145/3410530.3414430
Hilligoss, B., & Rieh, S. Y. (2008). Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context. Information Processing and Management, 44, 1467–1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.10.001
Hoffmann, D. A., & LaBonte, K. (2012). Meeting information literacy outcomes: partnering with faculty to create effective information literacy assessment. Journal of information Literacy, 6(2), 85. http://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/ojs/index.php/JIL/article/view/1615
Ifantidou, E. (2009). Newspaper headlines and relevance: Ad hoc concepts in ad hoc contexts. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(4), 699–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.016
Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia. (2020). Realitas Media di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19. http://www.kpi.go.id/index.php/id/umum/38-dalam-negeri/35850-realitas-media-di-tengah-pandemi-covid-19
Leeder, C. (2016). Practicing critical evaluation of online sources improves student search behavior. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(4), 459–468. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133316300143
Leeder, Chris. (2019). How college students evaluate and share “fake news†stories. Library & Information Science Research, 41(3). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740818819300787
Matlin, M. W. (2013). Cognition (8th edition). Wiley.
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., Markov, A., Grossman, R., & Bulger, M. (2015). Believing the unbelievable: understanding young people’s information literacy beliefs and practices in the United States. Journal of Children and Media, 9(3), 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2015.1056817
Muktarruddin, M. (2021). Disentralisasi komunikasi transendental merajut kerukunan umat beragama di tengah pandemi covid-19. Jurnal Komunika Islamika : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi dan Kajian Islam, 8(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.37064/JKI.V8I1.9479
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Who falls for fake news ? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. Journal of personality, 88(2), 185–200.
Potthast, M., Köpsel, S., Stein, B., & Hagen, M. (2016). Clickbait Detection. European Conference on Information Retrieval, 810–817.
Purwanti, A. R. (2019). Analyzing Indonesian online newspaper headlines using lexical functional grammar. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 19(2), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.17509/bs_jpbsp.v19i2.24782
Reis, J. C. S., de Souza, F. B., de Melo, P. O. S. V., Prates, R. O., Kwak, H., & An, J. (2015, April 21). Breaking the news: First impressions matter on online news. Ninth International AAAI conference on web and social media. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM15/paper/viewPaper/10568
Saputra, D. (2020). Fenomena informasi palsu (hoax) pada media sosial di tengah pandemi covid-19 dalam perspektif Islam. Jurnal Dakwah dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 2, 1–10.
Saxena, S. (2006). Headline Writing. Sage Publications.
Sisodia, D. S. (2019). Ensemble learning approach for clickbait detection using article headline features. Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg, 22, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.28945/4279
Smith, E. J. (1999). Leadlines may be better than traditional headlines. Newspaper Research Journal, 20(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/073953299902000105
Walton, G., & Hepworth, M. (2011). A longitudinal study of changes in learners’ cognitive states during and following an information literacy teaching intervention. Journal of Documentation, 67(3), 449–479. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411111124541/FULL/HTML
We Are Social, & HootSuite. (2020). Indonesia Digital report 2020. Global Digital Insights. https://www.slideshare.net/DataReportal/digital-2020-indonesia-january-2020-v01
Widodo, A. (2020). Teror informasi dan perilaku mahasiswa dalam penggunaan media sosial di tengah pandemi covid-19. Civic-Culture: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan PKN Dan Sosial Budaya, 4(1), 45–58. http://194.59.165.171/index.php/CC/article/view/364
Yunus, N. R., & Rezki, A. (2020). Kebijakan pemberlakuan lock down sebagai antisipasi penyebaran corona virus Covid-19. Salam: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i, 7(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v7i3.15083
Author Biographies
Cucu Taqyah, Universitas Padjadjaran
Rachmi Silviana, Universitas Padjadjaran
Adilla Aulia Anwar, Universitas Padjadjaran
Fitri Ariyanti Abidin, Universitas Padjadjaran
Fakultas Psikologi
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).