Implementasi Konsep Partisipasi Bermakna dalam Proses Pembentukan Undang-Undang: Studi Kasus Pembuatan Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tentang Kesehatan Tahun 2023
Authors
Afdhal Mahatta , Satrio Alif FebriyantoDOI:
10.31289/jiph.v11i1.10237Published:
2024-06-30Issue:
Vol. 11 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM JUNIKeywords:
health law, meaningful participation, Law formulation processArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Abstract
The establishment of Law Number 17 Year 2023 on health has received enormous public attention. The magnitude of public awareness is not only due to significant changes in substance. More than that, reactions from the public, especially health professional organizations as the element of society most affected by the law, have caused a heated discourse in the community. The reaction arose because health professional organizations felt that they did not get significant participation in forming the health law. The issue of participation will be studied using the normative juridical method to find out regulations and theories related to ideal meaningful participation in creating a law. Furthermore, the normative juridical approach will be strengthened by using statistical data on aspirations and minutes from each public participation activity to examine public participation in forming Law Number 17 of 2023 on health. Based on the study's results, the formation of this law has fulfilled the elements of public participation quantitatively, with a note that only a few aspirations of civil society elements were accommodated
References
Arif, A. (2023, July 11). Pengesahan UU Kesehatan Menuai Kritik dari Masyarakat Sipil. Kompas.Id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/humaniora/2023/07/11/pengesahan-uu-kesehatan-dinilai-tak-memerhatikan-aspirasi-masyarakat-sipil
Ayu, T. (2023, June 5). Turun ke Jalan, Organisasi Profesi Nilai RUU Kesehatan Tak Dibahas Transparan. Tempo.Co. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1733669/turun-ke-jalan-organisasi-profesi-nilai-ruu-kesehatan-tak-dibahas-transparan
Bagaskara, M., & Dwijayanti, H. (2023, May 9). Alasan RUU Kesehatan 2023 Dinilai Tidak Adil dan Banyak Masalah. Tempo.Co. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1723512/alasan-ruu-kesehatan-2023-dinilai-tidak-adil-dan-banyak-masalah?page_num=2
BBC. (2022, April 12). RUU TPKS disahkan setelah berbagai penolakan selama enam tahun, apa saja poin pentingnya? BBC. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-61077691
Boucoyannis, D. (2015). No Taxation of Elites, No Representation: State Capacity and the Origins of Representation,. Politics & Society, 43(3), 303–332.
CNN Indonesia. (2022, November 28). Organisasi Profesi Tolak RUU Kesehatan: Ada Upaya Kapitalisasi. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20221128120248-20-879690/organisasi-profesi-tolak-ruu-kesehatan-ada-upaya-kapitalisasi
CNN Indonesia. (2023, July 11). Demo Tolak Paripurna RUU Kesehatan di DPR, Sindir Menkes Bukan Dokter. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20230711110129-20-971939/demo-tolak-paripurna-ruu-kesehatan-di-dpr-sindir-menkes-bukan-dokter
Congleton, R. D. (2007). From royal to parliamentary rule without revolution: The economics of constitutional exchange within divided governments. European Journal of Political Economy, 23, 261–284.
Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat. (n.d.). Program Legislasi Nasional: RUU tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Seksual. Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat. https://www.dpr.go.id/uu/detail/id/411
Doctors for Life International v. The Speaker of The National Assembly, (Mahkamah Konstitusi Afrika Selatan August 17, 2006).
Falkiner, C. L. (1905). The Parliament of Ireland under the Tudor Sovereigns: With Some Notices of the Speakers of the Irish House of Commons. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy: Archaeology, Culture, History, Literature, 25, 508–541.
Fauzi, R. A. (2023, July 12). Ribuan Tenaga Kesehatan Demo Tolak Pengesahan RUU Kesehatan. Tribunnews. https://wartakota.tribunnews.com/2023/07/12/ribuan-tenaga-kesehatan-demo-tolak-pengesahan-ruu-kesehatan
Hanneke, M. J. (2017). Meaningful and Authentic Participation: What does it mean and how can we ensure it in Amherst? Memo to Charter Commission, 1–9.
Hantoro, N. M. (2013). Kewenangan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 92/PUU-X/2012. Negara Hukum, 4(2), 197–213.
Hidayati, S. (2019). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang: Studi Perbandingan Indonesia dengan Afrika Selatan. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 3(2), 224–241.
Indonesia Corruption Watch. (2023, June 14). Tunda Pengesahan RUU Kesehatan: Perbaiki dan Pastikan Partisipasi Publik yang Bermakna [Indonesia Corruption Watch]. https://antikorupsi.org/id/tunda-pengesahan-ruu-kesehatan-perbaiki-dan-pastikan-partisipasi-publik-yang-bermakna
Indrati, M. F. (2007). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan Jilid 2: Proses dan Teknik Pembuatannya. Kanisius.
Indrati, M. F. (2020). Ilmu Perundang-undangan Jilid 1: Jenis, Fungsi, dan Materi Muatan. Kanisius.
Jati, R. (2012). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam proses pembentukan undang-undang yang responsif. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 1(3), 329–342.
Katingka, N. (2023, July 11). Undang-Undang Kesehatan Disahkan, Penolakan Tetap Bergulir. Kompas.Id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/humaniora/2023/07/11/uu-kesehatan-disahkan-penolakan-tetap-bergulir
Mariana, D. (2015). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Proses Kebijakan. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 1(2), 216–229.
Maulana, M. R., & Firmansyah, R. (2023). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Usaha yang Menambang di Kawasan Hutan Tanpa Izin. Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 3.
Nasution, A. I., & Sapii, R. B. S. (2022). Aktualisasi Konsep Meaningful Participation dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan, 9(2), 202–220.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang Pengujian Formil Konstitusionalitas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja, Putusan MK Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 (Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia November 25, 2021).
Qamar, N. (2022). Ilmu dan Teknik Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. CV. Social Politic Genius.
Rhonheimer, M. (2019). St. Thomas Aquinas and the Idea of Limited Government. Journal of Markets & Morality, 22(2), 439–455.
Riskiyono, J. (2015). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pembentukan Perundang-Undangan untuk Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan. Aspirasi, 6(2), 159–176.
Saptoyo, R. D. A. (2021, September 4). 4 Poin Perubahan RUU PKS ke RUU Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2021/09/04/151500865/4-poin-perubahan-ruu-pks-ke-ruu-tindak-pidana-kekerasan-seksual?page=all
Satria, P. (2023, February 16). RUU Kesehatan (Omnibus Law). Open Parliament. https://openparliament.id/2023/02/16/ruu-kesehatan-omnibus-law/
Setiawan, A. (2018). Partisipasi Civil Society dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang. Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 1(2), 159–176.
Tarmizi, S. N. (2023, July 11). Ketok Palu! RUU Kesehatan Sah jadi Undang-Undang. Kementerian Kesehatan. https://sehatnegeriku.kemkes.go.id/baca/rilis-media/20230711/4643487/ketok-palu-ruu-kesehatan-sah-jadi-undang-undang/
Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, 12, 96 47 (2011).
Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan Kedua Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, 12, 96 (2022).
Wisnuwardani, D. P. W. (2023, July 11). RUU Kesehatan Disahkan Jadi Undang-Undang, CISDI Nilai Terburu-Buru dan Tidak Transparan. Liputan6. https://www.liputan6.com/health/read/5342227/ruu-kesehatan-disahkan-jadi-undang-undang-cisdi-nilai-terburu-buru-dan-tidak-transparan
Zanden, J. L. V., Buringh, E., & Bosker, M. (2012). The rise and decline of European parliaments, 1188—1789. The Economic History Review, 65(3), 835–861.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).