Analisis Hukum Perkara Jaminan Fidusia dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Padang Nomor 38/Pdt.G/2018/PN Pdg

Febi Kinanti Ardo(1*),


(1) Universitas Andalas
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The occurrence of the agreement on a vehicle financing agreement with the transfer of ownership rights fiduciary between PT. Pro Car International Finance (creditor) with a debtor No. No. 0450001897 dated May 31, 2014. The Debtor has not fulfilled its obligations since the 32nd installment due on December 31, 2016. The reason the debtor did not fulfill the obligation because the debtor has committed a crime. Upon the situation of the debtor, the PT. Pro Car International Finance states that the debtor has violated Article 1365 and Article 1366 of the Civil Code. The purpose of this study is first, to find out the form of acts against the law in Case number: 38 / Pdt.G / 2018 / PN Pdg, second, to find out the basis for judges' consideration of acts against the law in Case number: 38 / Pdt.G / 2018 / PN Pdg. This research method is normative juridical with qualitative analysis and presented descriptively. The results obtained, firstly, that the form of acts against the law in case number: 38 / Pdt.G / 2018 / PN Pdg in the form, acts that are contrary to their own legal obligations. The second result, that the basis for consideration of the Judge gave a decision on a lawsuit against the law in case number: 38 / Pdt.G / 2018 / PN Pdg is the debtor has been proven to have committed an unlawful act and the judge granted part of the demand for the Defendant to pay a loss of Rp 82,745 .681.00 with interest and penalties.


Keywords


Lawsuit Against the Law, Fiduciary Guarantee

Full Text:

PDF

References


Djojodirjo, M. (1992). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

Ibrahim, J. (2005). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayu Media Publishing.

Siamat, D. (2001). Manajemen Lembaga Keuangan. Jakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.

Sunggono, B. (2003). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Witanto, D. (2015). Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Nainggolan, P.N.H., dan Isnaini, (2012), Analisis Terhadap Penetapan No: 01/Pen.Pdt.G/ Eks/HT/2010/ PN-PMS tentang Eksekusi Barang Jaminan oleh Bank dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Bermasalah, Mercatoria, 5 (1): 56-65

Hidayat, dan Ediwarman, (2013), Analisis Hukum Perlindungan Korban dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Kabupaten Aceh Timur (Studi di Pengadilan Negeri IDI), Mercatoria, 6 (1): 44-63

Alodia, D. & Pandamdari, E.(2018). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Dalam Hal Debitor Menyewakan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Kepada Pihak Ke Tiga (Analisis Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1271 K/PDT/2016), Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 1(1).

Chintia, N.Y. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Pemegang Jaminan Fidusia Terkait dengan Penyalahgunaan Objek Jaminan oleh Debitur”. (Thesis S2, Universitas Indonesia, 2010).

Kamello, T. (2006). Hukum Jaminan Fidusia (Suatu Kebutuhan yang Didambakan). Bandung: PT Alumni.

Hamzah, A dan Manullang, S. (1987). Lembaga Fidusia dan Penerapannya di Indonesia. (Jakarta: Ind-Hill Co.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v6i2.2730

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ISSN 2355-987X (Print) | ISSN 2622-061X (Online)