Keabsahan Putusan Pengadilan yang Belum Inkracht sebagai Novum dalam Pengajuan Peninjauan Kembali

Hardy Salim(1*), Yoefanca Halim(2), Adriel Michael Tirayo(3),


(1) Sutedja & Associates
(2) Universitas Tarumanagara
(3) Universitas Tarumanagara
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


A judicial institution has criteria that must be met, namely principles that are open, corrective, and recordive. The broadest opportunity to submit corrections and recordings of decisions that have permanent legal force (inkracht) deemed unfair by justice seekers can be done through a Judicial Review. However, the Judicial Review is very limitative, one of them with the requirement for novum. But the regulation of conditions can be said to be a condition as a novum not strictly regulated. By looking at this matter, the research is carried out with the aim of finding out the validity of court decisions which have not been inkracht as novum in the submission for reconsideration. This study is using a normative research method. In conclusion, court decisions that have not been inkracht as novum in submitting judicial review are valid because they need to prioritize the value of justice and truth before legal certainty. As long as the prerequisites in Article 263 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code have been fulfilled, and one of the requirements in paragraph (2) has been fulfilled.


Keywords


Legitimacy, Court Decision, Judicial Review, Novum

Full Text:

PDF

References


Butarbutar, E.N. (2018). Asas Ne bis In Idem dalam Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Jurnal Yudisial. 11(1): 23-39.

Fanani, A. Z. (2011). Berpikir Falsafati Dalam Putusan Hakim. Jurnal Varia Peradilan No. 304.

Majalah Hukum Varia Peradilan November 2009 Tahun XXV No. 288. (2009). Jakarta: IKAHI, I.S.S.N No. 0215-0247.

Zamzami, A. (2018). Keadilan Di Jalan Raya. Jurnal Yurispruden. 1(2): 17-34.

Bentham, J. (1789). An Introduction to The Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: Batoche Books Kichener.

Chazawi, A. (2010). Lembaga Peninjauan Kembali (PK) Perkara Pidana: Penegakan Hukum dalam Penyimpangan Praktik & Peradilan Sesat. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Effendi, T. (2014). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Acara Pidana: Perkembangan dan Pembaharuannya di Indonesia. Malang: Setara Press.

Garner, B.A. (1999). Black’s Law Dictionary. United States of America: West Group.

Kusumaatmadja, M. (2006). Konsep-Konsep Hukum Dalam Pembangunan. Bandung: Alumni.

Lamintang, P.A.F. dan Samosir, C. (2010). Delik-Delik Khusus Kejahatan Yang Ditujukan Terhadap Hak Milik Dan Lain-Lain Hak Yang Timbul Dari Hak Milik. Bandung: TARSITO Bandung.

Marzuki, P.M. (2009). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

ND, M.F dan Achmad, Y. (2010). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Cetakan Pertama. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Rahardjo, S. (2012). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rawls, J. (2006). A Theory of Justice, Teori Keadilan. Diterjemahkan oleh Uzair Fauzan dan Heru Prasetyo. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Reksodiputro, M. (2007). Bunga Rampai Permasalahan dalam Sistem Peradilan. Cetakan Kelima. Jakarta: Pusat pelayanan dan Pengabdian Hukum Lembaga Kriminologi UI.

Rifa’I, A. (2011). Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Sarwono. (2011). Hukum Acara Perdata Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Simanjuntak, N. (2009). Acara Pidana Indonesia dalam Sirkus Hukum. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Sitabuana, T.H. (2011). Penyelesaian Masalah Diskriminasi Terhadap Etnis Cina. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Soekanto, S. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI-Press.

Sofyan, A dan Asis, A. (2014). Hukum Acara Pidana: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Kencana.

Sunggono, B. (2007). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Zaanzerberger, G. (1971). International Law and Order. London: Steven & Sons Ltd..

CNN. (2019). PK Baiq Nuril Ditolak MA. Diunduh di https://m.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20190705092009-12-409314/pk-baiq-nuril-ditolak-ma tanggal 26 Oktober 2019.

Rivki. (2017). Kasus Bioremediasi, PK 3 Karyawan Chevron Indonesia Dikabulkan MA. Diunduh di https://m.detik.com/news/berita/d-3744508/kasus-bioremediasi-pk-3-karyawan-chevron-indonesia-dikabulkan-ma tanggal 26 Oktober 2019.

Tim Viva. (2018). PK Ahok Dikabulkan Atau Ditolak, Ini Analisis Pakar Hukum. Diunduh di https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.viva.co.id/amp/berita/metro/1011102-pk-ahok-dikabulkan-atau-ditolak-ini-analisis-pakar-hukum tanggal 11 September 2019.

Pratiwi, P.S. (2018). Putusan Buni Yani Belum Inkrah, Dasar PK Ahok Dipertanyakan. Diunduh di https://m.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20180221084125-12-277624/putusan-buni-yani-belum-inkrah-dasar-pk-ahok-dipertanyakan tanggal 24 September 2019.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v6i2.2961

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ISSN 2355-987X (Print) | ISSN 2622-061X (Online)