Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Ketidaksesuaian Akta Salinan dengan Minuta Akta

Yoefanca Halim(1*), Fricky Sudewo(2), Tyas Fidelia(3),


(1) Universitas Tarumanagara
(2) Universitas Tarumanagara
(3) Universitas Tarumanagara
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Notary as a general official has authorization in making an authentic deed and have other powers as referred to in this law or under other laws, as described in the Department of Law Notary. In carrying out his position, a notary is obliged to act as a trustee, honest, equitable, independent, immutated, and keep the interests of the parties and to make the deed Minuta. In addition, a notary is obliged to issue the Grosse deed, copy of the deed, or Deed citation based on Minuta deed, such matters are governed by Law No.2 of 2014 as has been amended by Law No. 30 of 2004 on the Department of notary. It means that a notary is supposed to carry out obligations. But in fact, the notary can still be found that does not carry out obligations as stipulated in the notary law. By looking at this raises an issue about, "What is Notary's responsibility for the inconsistency of the Copy act with the Minuta deed?". In general, the responsibilities of notary public can be examined in the public, criminal, notary LAW, and responsibility for performing the duties of the department under the notary Code of Ethics. Civil liability regarding material truth in the deed made and can be categorized as making false documents in criminal terms. While the responsibilities according to the LAW and the Code of Ethics Department notary, notary may be subject to sanctions in the form of oral warning, letters, temporary stops, and stops with respect or disrespect.

 


Keywords


Notary, Deed, Notarized Responsibilities.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adjie,H. (2002). Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif terhadap Notaris sebagai Pejabat Publik. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Anshori, AG. (2009). Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia, Perspektif Hukum dan Etika. Banten : UII Press.

Anwar, A.T. (2011). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Ketidaksesuaian Isi Salinan Akta Dengan Minuta Akta Notaris Dalam Perjanjian Kerja ama (Studi Kasus: Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru Nomor 54/Pdt/G/2008/Pn.Pbr – Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Riau Nomor 94/Pdt/2009/Ptr). Tesis. Depok: FH UI.

Arief, BN. (2001). Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Bertens, K. (1997). Etika. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Fitriyeni, C.E. (2010). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Penyimpanan Minuta Akta Sebagai Bagian Dari Protokol Notaris. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. 14 (58).

Fuady, M. (2010). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Pendekatan Kontemporer). Cet.3. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti

HS, Salim dan Septiana Nurbani, E. (2014). Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Disertasi dan Tesis Buku Kedua. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Kie, T.T. (2000). Studi Notariat: Beberapa Mata Pelajaran dan Serba-Serbi Praktek Notariat, Buku I, Cetakan ke-2. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve.

Kie, T.T, . (2007). Studi Notariat: Beberapa Mata Pelajaran dan Serba-Serbi Praktek Notariat, Buku I, Cetakan ke-2. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve.

Marzuki, P.M. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Marzuki, P.M.. (2013). Penelitian Hukum, Cetakan ke-8, Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana.

Muljatno. (1993). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Nico. (2003). Tanggungjawab Notaris Selaku Pejabat Umum. Banten: Center for Documentation and Studies of Business Law.

____. Tanggung Jawab Notaris Selaku Pejabat Umum. (Yogyakarta: CDBSL).

Purwaningsih, E. (2015). Bentuk Pelanggaran Hukum Notaris Di Wilayah Provinsi Banten dan Penegakan Hukumnya. Mimbar Hukum. 27(1).

Saleh, R. (1983). Perbuatan Pidana dan b Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dua Pengertian Dasar dalam Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Aksan Baru.

Subekti. (2001). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Intermasa.

Sukarno, A. et al. (2013). Filsafat Hukum Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Tedjosaputro, L (1995). Etika Profesi Notaris dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Bayu Grafika.

Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tenntang Jabatan Notaris (UU No. 30 Tahun 2004)

Winarno, D.P. (2015). Konsekuensi Yuridis Salinan Akta Notaris Yang Tidak Sama Bunyinya Dengan Minuta Akta Terhadap Keabsahan Perjanjian. Arena Hukum. 8(3).

Wiryomartani, W. (2011). Pelanggaran Pidana/Perdata Dan Tindakan Indisipliner Oleh Notaris”. Makalah. Disampaikan pada Seminar Minuta. Depok: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 23 Februari 2011.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v6i2.2962

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ISSN 2355-987X (Print) | ISSN 2622-061X (Online)