Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Berikut adalah penjelasan singkat tentang bidang-bidang yang tercakup dalam bidang teknik mesin

  • Analisis struktur : membahas tentang kemampuan suatu struktur/konstruksi dalam menahan beban.
  • Material teknik : membahas tentang kekuatan material serta cara pembentukan suatu material
  • Kinematika : membahas tentang analisis gerakan (posisi, kecepatan dan percepatan) pada suatu mekanisme.
  • Dinamika : membahas tentang analisis gerakan pada suatu mekanisme dalam kaitannya dengan gaya/torsi yang bekerja.
  • Termodinamika : membahas tentang energi dan perubahannya dari suatu bentuk ke energi lainnya.
  • Perpindahan kalor : membahas tentang perpindahan energi berupa panas/kalor beserta distribusi temperatur yang terjadi.
  • Teknik Material : membahas sifat material dan proses pembuatannya
  • Mesin konversi energi : membahas sistem berupa siklus yang digunakan untuk menghasilkan kerja berupa gerak
  • Teknik pendingin/refrigerasi : membahas sistem yang digunakan untuk mendinginkan zat serta sistem pengkondisi udara
  • Mekanika fluida : membahas analisis fluda dalam keadaan statis (diam) maupun dinamis (bergerak). Contoh : tekanan atau gaya pengapungan yang dihasilkan fluida serta gaya hambat yang bekerja pada suatu kendaraan.
  • Aerodinamika : bagian dari mekanika fluida yang mambahas aliran gas di seputar benda padat.
  • Hidrodinamika : bagian dari mekanika fluida yang membahas aliran zat cair di seputar benda padat.
  • Metrologi : membahas tentang metode dan alat ukut geometri (bentuk)
  • Getaran mekanik : membahas tentang analisis getaran untuk melakukan prediksi dan pengendalian getaran.
  • Otomasi industri : membahas alat dan metode otomatis yang digunakan di industri
  • Mekatronika : membahas tentang sistem kendali mekanik menggunakan peranti elektronik dan komputer
  • Manufaktur : adalah bidang ilmu rekayasa yang mempelajari proses pembuatan produk, mulai dari proses perancangan, proses produksi hingga proses kontrol kualitas.


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Setiap artikel yang telah si submit ke jurnal JMEMME akan di periksa originalnya terlebih dahulu oleh editor menggunakan tools semi premium, setelah itu akan diteruskan ke reviewer.  Artikel akan di review oleh reviewer/mitra bestari. Waktu yang diperlukan untuk melakukan review maksimal 4 minggu. Proses review dilakukan dengan Double Blind Peer-Review.


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...


Malpractice Statements

Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Hasil gambar untuk committee on publication ethics logo

Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.


Digital Archiving Policy

JPPUMA use  Open Journal Systems supports the LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) system to ensure a secure and permanent archive for the journal


Screening For Plagiarism

The manuscript that submitted into this journal will be screened for plagiarism using PLAGIARISMA.NET