Web Analytics Made Easy -
StatCounter

Penyadapan oleh KPK dalam Perspektif Due Process of Law

Autor(s): Tamara Laurencia
DOI: 10.31289/mercatoria.v12i2.2790

Abstract

Corruption is very detrimental. KPK was established to eradicate corruption and is given extensive duties and authority. KPK is given the authority to conduct investigation and prosecution, and in the implementation, KPK has the authority to conduct wiretapping. However, the authority given to KPK in conducting wiretapping seems to be too broad and was given without any clear boundaries in terms of the time limit for example. It should also require permission to conduct wiretapping in order to uphold the law. Wiretapping has been a violation of privacy towards citizen rights. The right can only be limited by the Law, but it cannot be removed from existence. One of the principles of criminal procedure in Indonesia is due process of law that consist of three important aspects, namely presumption of innocence, equality before the law, and the rule of law. This principle basically requires the protection of the rights of the suspects or defendants in terms of the substance of the law that regulates or the implementation, which in this case is not to be considered guilty during criminal justice process, equality before the law regarding the right to privacy that can only be limited, not removed from existence.

Keywords

Wiretapping, KPK, Due Process of Law

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adang, Y.A. (2009). Sistem Peradilan Pidana; Konsep, Komponen, & Pelaksanaannya Dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Bandung: Widya Padjajaran.

Baharu, B. & Akub, M.S. (2012). Wawasan Due Proses of Law dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education.

Fuller, L.L. (1964). The Morrality of Law. Revised Edition, Amerika: Yale University Press.

Garner, B.A. (2004). Black’s Law Dictionary. Eigth Edition. St. Paul Minnesota: Thomson West.

Gunawan, Y. & Kristian. (2013). Sekelumit tentang Penyadapan dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Bandung: Nuansa Aulia.

Huda, N.M. (2012). Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Husin, B.R & Husin, K. (2016). Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Latif, A. (2014). Hukum Administrasi dalam Praktik Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Kencana.

Manthovani, R. (2015). Penyadapan Vs Privasi. Jakarta: Bhuana Ilmu Populer.

Rukmini, M. (2003). Perlindungan HAM melalui Asas Praduga Tak Bersalah dan Asas Persamaan Kedudukan dalam Hukum pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Bnadung: Alumni.

Rahmadi, R.H. (2010). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sadjijono. (2008). Memahami Beberapa Bab Pokok Hukum Administrasi. Yogyakarta: LaksBang.

Sema, M. (2008). Negara dan Korupsi Pemikiran Mochtar Lubis atas Negara Manusia Indonesia, dan Perilaku Politik. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Tahir, H. (2010). Proses Hukum yang Adil dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: LaksBang Pressindo.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.