Public Participation in the Social Science: A Systematic Literature Review


Muhammad Ainul Usama(1*), Ulung Pribadi(2), Al Fauzi Rahmat(3),


(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
(3) Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Public participation is the right and obligation of citizens to contribute to development by contributing to initiative and creativity. Public participation has also attracted a lot of attention from academia as a concept of public policy. The authors conducted a systematic literature review of published articles in the social sciences to enhance our understanding of public participation. Some of the main issues are explained in this area through the NVIVO 12 plus software that qualitative analysis tool. The main issues are community, development, government, information, and interests. This article raises several propositions on the matter. This article suggests some new topics for further research.


Keywords


Public Participation; Social Sciences; Literature Review

Full Text:

PDF

References


Armeni, C., & Anker, HT (2020). Public participation and appeal rights in decision-making on wind energy infrastructure: a comparative analysis of the Danish and English legal framework. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 63 (5), 842–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1614436

Brandão, C., & Miguez, J. (2017). Using NVivo to assess a corrected empathic attunement skills program objective: A case study in the context of higher education. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16 (4), 863–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0476-x

Brown, G., & Kyttä, M. (2014). Key issues and research priorities for public participation in GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography, 46, 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004

Chen, W., & Hu, ZH (2020). Analysis of multi-stakeholders' behavioral strategies considering public participation under carbon taxes and subsidies: An evolutionary game approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12 (3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031023

DeMenno, MB (2019). Technocracy, democracy, and public policy: An evaluation of public participation in retrospective regulatory review. Regulation and Governance, 13 (3), 362–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12173

Duan, R., Liu, J., Wang, C., & Wei, G. (2020). Influencing factors of public participation in meteorological disaster prevention and mitigation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12 (8), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12083108

Feng, L., Wu, Q., Wu, W., & Liao, W. (2020). Decision-Maker-Oriented VS. Collaboration: China 's Public Participation in Environmental Decision-Making. Sustainability Article, 12 (1334). https://doi.org/doi:10.3390/su12041334

Franceschini, S., & Marletto, GE (2019). The dynamics of trust during public participation. Papers in Regional Science, 98 (4), 1713–1729. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12426

Fu, Y., & Ma, W. (2020). Sustainable urban community development: A case study from the perspective of self-governance and public participation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12 (2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020617

Giuffrida, N., Le Pira, M., Inturri, G., & Ignaccolo, M. (2019). Mapping with stakeholders: An overview of public participatory GIS and VGI in transport decision-making. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8 (4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8040198

Gregorio, S. at. (, 2000). Using NVivo for Your Literature Review. Paper Presented on Strategy in Qualitative Research: Problems and Results from an Analysis Using the NVivo QSR and NUD * IST, Conference at the Educational Institute, London, 1-12.

Hasanzadeh, K., Kajosaari, A., Häggman, D., & Kyttä, M. (2020). A context sensitive approach to anonymizing public participation GIS data: From development to the assessment of anonymization effects on data quality. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 83 (February), 101513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101513

Johnson, T. (2020). Public participation in China's EIA process and the regulation of environmental disputes. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 81 (December 2019), 106359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106359

Jomehpour, M., & Behzad, M. (2020). An investigation on shaping local waste management services based on public participation: A case study of Amol, Mazandaran Province, Iran. Environmental Development, 35 (April 2019), 100519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100519

Kakee, T. (2020). Deep-sea mining legislation in Pacific Island countries: From the perspective of public participation in approval procedures. Marine Policy, 117 (February), 103881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103881

Liu, L., Bouman, T., Perlaviciute, G., & Steg, L. (2019). Effects of trust and public participation on acceptability of renewable energy projects in the Netherlands and China. Energy Research and Social Science, 53 (September 2018), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.03.006

Moore, S. (2019). Digital government, public participation and service transformation: The impact of virtual courts. Policy and Politics, 47 (3), 495–509. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15586039367509

Nita, A., Ciocanea, CM, Manolache, S., & Rozylowicz, L. (2018). A network approach for understanding opportunities and barriers to effective public participation in the management of protected areas. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 8 (1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-018-0509-y

Pagliara, F., & Di Ruocco, I. (2018). How public participation could improve public decisions on rail investments? Regional Science Policy and Practice, 10 (4), 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12143

Pallett, H. (2018). Situating organizational learning and public participation: Stories, spaces and connections. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 43 (2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12214

Piyapong, J., Thidarat, B., Jaruwan, C., Siriphan, N., & Passanan, A. (2019). Enhancing citizens' sense of personal responsibility and risk perception for promoting public participation in sustainable groundwater resource management in Rayong Groundwater Basin, Thailand. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 9 (July), 100252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100252

Russell, V. (2020). Keeping warm cookies: Cultural discourses of fun talk in public participation. Journal of Civil Society, 16 (3), 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2020.1788247

Sandhaus, S., Kaufmann, D., & Ramirez-Andreotta, M. (2019). Public participation, trust and data sharing: gardens as hubs for citizen science and environmental health literacy efforts. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 9 (1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2018.1542752

Song, H. (2020). Perceived standing: exploring why people accept or reject others' access to public participation in local environmental conflicts. Local Environment, 25 (5), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2020.1753667

Sotiriadou, P., Brouwers, J., & Le, T.-A. (2014). Choosing a qualitative data analysis tool: Comparison of NVivo and Leximancer. Annals of Leisure Research, 17 (2), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2014.902292

Wang, Y., Cao, H., Yuan, Y., & Zhang, R. (2020). Empowerment through emotional connection and capacity building: Public participation through environmental non-governmental organizations. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 80 (September 2019), 106319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106319

Zhang, L., Hooimeijer, P., Lin, Y., & Geertman, S. (2020). Roles and Motivations of Planning Professionals Who Promote Public Participation in Urban Planning Practice: Two Case Studies from Beijing, China. Urban Affairs Review, 56 (4), 1237–1262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419895116




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v10i2.5187

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Politik, Universitas Medan Area

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.